Home » Forbidden Meat » Forbidden Meat: Circumstances when Spoken

Forbidden Meat: Circumstances when Spoken

Recent Posts: Health Laws And Places

Is salary increase for devolved PHWs possible despite the PS limitation?

In case, the Local Government Unit (LGU) is about to exceed the budgetary Personal Services (PS) Limitation, is there an alternative remedy for devolved public health workers (PHWs) to get salary increase, at par with their national counterpart? This PS limitation is provided under Section 325 of  R.A 7160, otherwise known as the Local Government […]

Are LGU Hospitals and RHUs exempt from PS limitation?

A major issue in devolved health facilities, e.g, devolved hospitals and Rural Health Units (RHUs),  concerns the personal services (PS) limitation being applied to them pursuant to Section 325 (a) of R.A 7160, otherwise known as the Local Government Code of 1991.   This is invoked by majority of budget officers from the local government […]

PPHA Magna Carta Benefits Petition Partly Granted

In G.R. No. 207145, the Supreme Court (SC) en banc ruled on the petition on Magna Carta benefits filed by the Philippine Public Health Association, Inc (PPHAI) against the Department of Budget and Management (DBM), Department of Health (DOH) and the Civil Service Commission (CSC). The petition, which was decided on July 28, 2015 as […]

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 716 other followers

To fully comprehend the intent of the prohibition, is it necessary to correlate the spoken words to the circumstances when they were spoken. But before discussing more deeply on the topic, it would be helpful to know the surrounding circumstances when the words were spoken.

Don't teach the youth in downstairs eat the forbidden meat

Don’t teach the youth in downstairs eat the forbidden meat. http://www.wordatthenet.com

In brief, these words were spoken to Noah and his sons after the flood.

4The one thing you must not eat is meat with blood still in it; I forbid this because the life is in the blood.(Genesis 9:4, TEV)

Although The Word does not specifically mention the traumatic effects of flood on the family of Noah, their fear may be seen and acknowledgement of  the power of God was exhibited by Noah’s acts of offering sacrifices to God.

13 When Noah was 601 years old, on the first day of the first month, the water was gone. Noah removed the covering of the boat, looked around, and saw that the ground was getting dry. 14 By the twenty-seventh day of the second month the earth was completely dry.

15 God said to Noah, 16 “Go out of the boat with your wife, your sons, and their wives. 17 Take all the birds and animals out with you, so that they may reproduce and spread over all the earth.” 18 So Noah went out of the boat with his wife, his sons, and their wives. 19 All the animals and birds went out of the boat in groups of their own kind.

20 Noah built an altar to the Lord; he took one of each kind of ritually clean animal and bird, and burned them whole as a sacrifice on the altar. (Genesis 8:13-20, TEV)

In verse 20, it gives us the clue that there are two types of animals(1) ritually clean and (2) not ritually clean. But what is stated in the succeeding verse is about the odor of the sacrifice, not about the odor of the ritually clean animals:

21 The odor of the sacrifice pleased the Lord, and he said to himself, “Never again will I put the earth under a curse because of what people do; I know that from the time they are young their thoughts are evil. Never again will I destroy all living beings, as I have done this time. 22 As long as the world exists, there will be a time for planting and a time for harvest. There will always be cold and heat, summer and winter, day and night.” (Genesis 8:21, TEV)

Then followed by Genesis 9:1-7 verses.

What is the difference between the word “sacrifice” and “ritually clean animals”? Simple- the word “sacrifice” is an act by one who has life but ritually clean animals, they are confirmed as such, if dead. In other words, the difference is too wide apart.

So, aside from designation for foods in Genesis 9:2-3,  ritually clean animals were ceremonially used for sacrifice, when the “words” were spoken. Contrary, therefore, to the present mind-set, when animal rights advocates are delusional,  the term “life” used in verse Genesis 9:4 refers only to human.

Besides, If the intention of the One who speaks the prohibition “not to eat meat with blood still in it” is to include animals in the word “life” in verse 4, then a corresponding prohibition should had been made long ago “not to kill and/or not to eat animals”. Also, do you think that He will be pleased with the odor of sacrifice made by Noah? The surrounding circumstances when the words were spoken therefore would support the logical prohibition “not to eat human meat with human blood still in it”, which is equivalent to “sexually eating human meat” as in “oral sex“.

Click to The Oral Sex Theory to have a comprehensive understanding. (Next article: Human meat vs. Animal meat)

Related articles:

 >>>To Home Page to also proceed to The Forum


  1. […] Prohibited Meat: Circumstances when Spoken […]

  2. […] Filipino lesbians, homosexuals, including sexual perverts and pornographers must therefore thank President Benigno Aquino III for this benefit. Because, the President has […]

  3. […] Click to The Oral Sex Theory to have a comprehensive understanding. (Next article: Forbidden Meat: Circumstances when Spoken) […]

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: