Home » Religious Deception » The Last Supper & ‘Da Vinci Fallacy’ doctrine

The Last Supper & ‘Da Vinci Fallacy’ doctrine

Recent Posts: Health Laws And Places

Is salary increase for devolved PHWs possible despite the PS limitation?

In case, the Local Government Unit (LGU) is about to exceed the budgetary Personal Services (PS) Limitation, is there an alternative remedy for devolved public health workers (PHWs) to get salary increase, at par with their national counterpart? This PS limitation is provided under Section 325 of  R.A 7160, otherwise known as the Local Government […]

Are LGU Hospitals and RHUs exempt from PS limitation?

A major issue in devolved health facilities, e.g, devolved hospitals and Rural Health Units (RHUs),  concerns the personal services (PS) limitation being applied to them pursuant to Section 325 (a) of R.A 7160, otherwise known as the Local Government Code of 1991.   This is invoked by majority of budget officers from the local government […]

PPHA Magna Carta Benefits Petition Partly Granted

In G.R. No. 207145, the Supreme Court (SC) en banc ruled on the petition on Magna Carta benefits filed by the Philippine Public Health Association, Inc (PPHAI) against the Department of Budget and Management (DBM), Department of Health (DOH) and the Civil Service Commission (CSC). The petition, which was decided on July 28, 2015 as […]

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 716 other followers

Leonardo da Vinci revolutionized Christendom with “The Last Supper” painting, depicting the alleged images of Jesus Christ and his apostles, contrary to a divine warning in the second commandment “not to make images of anything in heaven or on earth or in the water under the earth” (Exodus 20:4).

Waiting in the lobby is like waiting for stranger Christ but, religiously, not for Da Vinci as far as his own false Christ is concerned .

Waiting at the lobby is like waiting for stranger Christ but, religiously, not for Da Vinci as far as his own false Christ is concerned. http://www.wordatthenet.com

He succumbed to his artistic ingenuity leading to  “Da Vinci Fallacy” doctrine, which deceived the world of real images of Christ and his apostles and further reinforced the Roman Catholicism doctrine of idolatry.

Setting aside traditional religious orientations and just basing on logic, Da Vinci was grossly wrong in proposing that the images he drawn  belong to Christ and his disciples, for a simple reason that they were not personally present when Da Vinci was painting.

But because the images were presented as sort of ‘reflections’ using deceptive spiritual belief system and ‘faith’ in lies, less likely that followers would question the ‘proposition’ due to possible backlash of not ‘loving’, phrasing’ or ‘following’ Christ.

Given the said historical backgrounds and letting tradition takes its course,  the image became the central focus for the returning Christ, and that likely, even believers or Christ himself, if not personally informed by the Father in heaven, would be deceived on his real image, when he returns. In short, so many believers, even preachers,  will be deceived despite having earnestly waited for Christ to come.

In the case of the publisher’s twelve (12) year old son, the impact of this painting is very tremendous, when he posted pictures in Facebook depicting the image of Christ similar to what  was painted in the ‘Last Supper’. It’s difficult to convince him that said image is just an innovation of an artist and that it is not the real image of Christ.

This is similar to what happened to Christmas, which was started with the name of Christ but ended and resulted to Santa Claus or ending in idolatry.  In short, the teachings of God, Christ and the Holy Spirit were in effect modified or replaced with the teachings of False Christ anchored on idolatry.

Below is a reference about Leonardo da Vinci from Wikipedia:

“Leonardo di ser Piero da Vinci (Italian pronunciation: [leoˈnardo da vˈvintʃi]); April 15, 1452 – May 2, 1519, Old Style) was an Italian Renaissancepolymath: painter, sculptor, architect, musician, mathematician, engineer, inventor, anatomist, geologist, cartographer, botanist, and writer.”

x x x

Leonardo was, and is, renowned primarily as a painter. Among his works, the Mona Lisa is the most famous and most parodied portrait[4] and The Last Supper the most reproduced religious painting of all time, with their fame approached only by Michelangelo‘s The Creation of Adam.[1] Leonardo’s drawing of the Vitruvian Man is also regarded as a cultural icon,[5] being reproduced on items as varied as the euro coin, textbooks, and T-shirts. Perhaps fifteen of his paintings survive, the small number because of his constant, and frequently disastrous, experimentation with new techniques, and his chronic procrastination.[nb 1] Nevertheless, these few works, together with his notebooks, which contain drawings, scientific diagrams, and his thoughts on the nature of painting, compose a contribution to later generations of artists rivalled only by that of his contemporary, Michelangelo”. (Wikipedia,the free encyclopedia).

Related articles:

>>>To Home Page to also proceed to The Forum


  1. […] The Last Supper & ‘Da Vinci Fallacy’ doctrine […]

  2. […] The Last Supper & ‘Da Vinci Fallacy’ doctrine […]

  3. […] The Last Supper & ‘Da Vinci Fallacy’ doctrine […]

  4. […] The Last Supper & ‘Da Vinci Fallacy’ doctrine […]

  5. […] was his name merely invented by the bible, his image merely created by Leonardo Da Vinci and the doctrines and practices being attached to him merely created by Christians, majority of […]

  6. […] The Last Supper & ‘Da Vinci Fallacy’ doctrine  […]

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: