Home » Religious Deception » The unholy and lying bible

The unholy and lying bible

Recent Posts: Health Laws And Places

Is salary increase for devolved PHWs possible despite the PS limitation?

In case, the Local Government Unit (LGU) is about to exceed the budgetary Personal Services (PS) Limitation, is there an alternative remedy for devolved public health workers (PHWs) to get salary increase, at par with their national counterpart? This PS limitation is provided under Section 325 of  R.A 7160, otherwise known as the Local Government […]

Are LGU Hospitals and RHUs exempt from PS limitation?

A major issue in devolved health facilities, e.g, devolved hospitals and Rural Health Units (RHUs),  concerns the personal services (PS) limitation being applied to them pursuant to Section 325 (a) of R.A 7160, otherwise known as the Local Government Code of 1991.   This is invoked by majority of budget officers from the local government […]

PPHA Magna Carta Benefits Petition Partly Granted

In G.R. No. 207145, the Supreme Court (SC) en banc ruled on the petition on Magna Carta benefits filed by the Philippine Public Health Association, Inc (PPHAI) against the Department of Budget and Management (DBM), Department of Health (DOH) and the Civil Service Commission (CSC). The petition, which was decided on July 28, 2015 as […]

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 715 other followers

Is the bible really holy and telling the truth that the true name of Christ is Jesus? These issues are worth discussing because billions of Christians are believing on the bible as holy and that allegedly, it contains the whole truth. Are these alleged holiness of the bible and truthfulness in it really so?

The lying bible

Pathology of lying

The hypothesis that maybe drawn as starting point for the discussion is that the bible is not holy, as it does not tell the whole truth.

First, we will settle the issue on alleged holiness of the bible by knowing first the meaning of word ‘holy’ as indicated in the old testament, more specifically in Leviticus 19:2, which states as follows:

2“Speak to all the congregation of the sons of Israel and say to them, ‘You shall be holy, for I the LORD your God am holy.(NIV)

For the above verse, how should the word ‘holy’ be understood as an adjective in relation to the subject that is being described in the verse? For example, the statement is: “You shall be holy” and “I the Lord your God am holy”.

More specifically, a clarificatory question that maybe propounded is: ‘what is the character of the subject in the above verse that is being described as holy?’ Does it refer to non-living things? No, therefore, the non-living things are not supposedly attached to the word ‘holy’.

But considering the premise that the Words of God are accompanied with life, therefore, they can be considered as living, then, they could also be considered as subjects that can be attached to the adjective ‘holy’.

Consequently, the word ‘holy’ can be appropriately used as an adjective to describe the bible, if it contains the whole truth. But if it contains even one false statement, then, the word ‘holy’ is not appropriate to use in order to describe it.

However, considering that the name Jesus did not exist in Bethlehem when the true Christ, who has an existing Hebrew name,  was born until he was crucified, then, all the statements in the bible, which relate to the person of Jesus, are no longer truths but falsities.

That being so, the Words of God in the bible, more specifically, the words pertaining to fictitious name Jesus, loss their life and therefore, the word ‘holy’ can no longer be appropriately used to describe such document. Finally, therefore, the bible is not holy as the statements therein are adversely affected by fictitious name Jesus, which converted truths into lies.

Related articles:

>>>To Home Page to also proceed to The Forum


  1. […] promoting the fictitious name Jesus, in lieu of the real name of the messiah. That being so, it can not be called as a Holy Bible at it contains more than one false statements as regard the messiah’s true name, which is […]

  2. […] In the preceding verses, the name Jesus is mentioned. However, it has to be clarified that the  name, being fictitious, is very material to the proposition that those believing on a wrong name are merely part of the “rock” and not part of the Church of Christ, as fictitious Jesus, who is considered falsely as the Head of the Church, did not actually exist. His name only happened to exist in the minds of the believers because of the unholy and lying bible. […]

  3. […] was his name merely invented by the bible, his image merely created by Leonardo Da Vinci and the doctrines and practices being attached to […]

Leave a Reply to Trinity of lies & deceptions in Jesus Christ « WORDatTheNet Cancel reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: