Is there trinity of lies and deceptions in Jesus Christ, which makes the name merely a product of man’s imagination and foolishness? Specifically, is Jesus Christ a real person in terms of authenticity of the name, authenticity of the image and validity of doctrines and practices being attached to him by false Christians?
Or was his name merely invented by the bible, his image merely created by Leonardo Da Vinci and the doctrines and practices being attached to him merely created by false Christians by deceptively stealing the Words of God and mis-using the story of the real messiah?
Related to the above issue is Habakkuk 2:12-14, which is a prophecy for Vatican City, being the headquarter of the Roman Catholicism. As a background, Habakkuk 2 prophecy refers to the judgment for United States (Habakkuk 2:4-8), United Kingdom (Habakkuk 2:15-17) Vatican City and France (Habakkuk 2:9-11).
Included in the prophecy is also a judgment for idolatrous nations, one of which is Brazil (Habakkuk 2:18-20), due to its “Christ the Redeemer” statue in Rio De Janeiro. Philippines and Nepal are also included.
The verses for Vatican City state as follows:
12 You are doomed! You founded a city on crime and built it up by murder. 13 The nations you
conquered wore themselves out in useless labor, and all they have built goes up in flames. The Lord Almighty has done this. 14 But the earth will be as full of the knowledge of the Lord’s glory as the seas are full of water.(Habakkuk 2:12-14, Today’s English Version)
Verse 12 pertains to the foundation of a city based on crime and murder, which Vatican City would easily qualify due to its historical past, e.g killing of early Christians by its predecessor-the Roman empire and killing of Jews, Muslims and other opposing groups through the crusades and other religious wars. In short, verse 12 expressly refers to the use of military or physical force.
But verse 13 refers to the influence of conqueror in the adoption of a form of belief or faith by conquered people, which is useless. This is implied in the statement “The nations you conquered wore themselves out in useless labor“.
Thus, what is being implied in verse 13 is conversion to a form of faith, which is not based on truth but based on lies. It is present, when people are made to believe on a fictitious name, fictitious image and false doctrines and practices, which are the characteristics of the present Christianity, being heavily influenced by Roman Catholicism.
Proceeding from the above premises, we shall discuss in details the three (3) forms of lies and deceptions that are attached to the persona of Jesus Christ, which can be designated as the ‘Trinity of Lies and Deceptions”.
Lie # 1: The Name
Why Jesus is a false name?
On the premise that the name does not evolve into another form according to Darwinian theory of evolution, the name Jesus is grossly fictitious because there was no Jesus name that existed when the messiah, who has an existing Hebrew name that is pronounced as ‘Yahushua’, was born until he was crucified. Notice that the name Jesus merely started to exist when letter ‘J’ in the English alphabet started to evolve 500 years ago. Also, assuming that there are so many languages worldwide, the pronunciation of a name in one language would less likely be different, when his name is being pronounced in other language.
It is because, despite the differences in languages, human beings have similar anatomical tongue, mouth and speaking and voice production organs. Unless, of course, if one has cleft palate or anatomical defects that may adversely affect his pronunciation. However, those with pronunciation defects are not logically expected to have significant influence on how a name is transliterated to another language, because any writer with serious pronunciation defects is less likely considered qualified.
Based on history, the name Jesus was transliterated from a Greek name Ἰησοῦς (Iēsous), which is being alleged to originate from an Aramaic name Yeshua. However, if directly transliterated to English, Yeshua becomes Joshua. Thus, Ἰησοῦς did not , at all, originate from the said Aramaic name. Neither, it logically originated from a Hebrew name, which is being pronounced as Yahushua, because a three-syllable name will not result to two-syllable transliterated English name Jesus.
The origin therefore of Jesus is Greek name Ἰησοῦς (Iēsous). Thus, he is deemed a fictitious Greek person and was not the one who was crucified on the cross to save humanity, because the messiah, who was crucified, was not Greek.
Also, notice that King James Version is found to have interesting problem in its use of the name Jesus. These are found in Acts 7:44-45 and Hebrews 4:7-8, stating as follows:
44 Our fathers had the tabernacle of witness in the wilderness, as he had appointed, speaking unto Moses, that he should make it according to the fashion that he had seen. 45 Which also our fathers that came after brought in with Jesus into the possession of the Gentiles, whom God drave out before the face of our fathers, unto the days of David; (Acts 7:44-45, KJV).
x x x
7 Again, he limiteth a certain day, saying in David, To day, after so long a time; as it is said, To day if ye will hear his voice, harden not your hearts.8 For if Jesus had given them rest, then would he not afterward have spoken of another day. (Hebrews 4:7-8, KJV).
Other versions, e,g, New International Version, International Standard Version, used Joshua instead of Jesus. Thus, the Bible made by men cannot be called holy at all because a single error logically makes it unholy. Worst, because the error is on the name, which is very critical in salvation.
Further, considering that the traces of the name of the Heavenly Father (YHVH) is no longer present in the name Jesus, it consequently follows that the promised salvation is likewise lost in said name.
Finally, therefore, due to the doubts on the validity of the English name Jesus, the remedy in order to be saved is to go back to the original Hebrew name of Christ, which is pronounced as ‘Yahushua’.
Lie # 2: The Face
Why the false image?
One thing is certain of the alleged image of Christ in the Last Supper painting of Leonardo Da Vinci. Despite having been accepted by Christians and by the public, the logical and practical conclusion is only one-it is a false image of Christ. It is false because, first, Christ did not appear European. Neither did he appear like Cesare Borgia, who is the illegitimate son of Pope Alexander VI (Rodrigo Borgia). Second, Da Vinci had not seen the face of Christ and neither did he had seen the faces of Christ’s apostles. Third, Da Vinci was only born in 1452 while Christ departed about 33 A.D.
In short, Da Vinci had no personal knowledge on the true image of Christ before he painted the image. Contrary to the imagination of artistic Christians therefore, Da Vinci is simply a false witness motivated by his worldly desire for fame. Consequently, those who believe on the image are merely deceived by traditional lies to believe on a false image of Christ.
Also, the image being professed to the world is contrary to the description in the scripture, more specifically, in Isaiah 53:2-3 or part of the suffering servant verses, which refer to the description of the returning Christ. The verses state as follows:
2 It was the will of the Lord that his servant grow like plant taking root in a dry ground. He had no dignity or beauty to make us notice of him. There is nothing attractive about him, nothing that would draw us to him.
3 We despised him and rejected him, he injured suffering and pain, No one would even look at him, we ignored him as if he were nothing. (Today’s English Version)
Above verses would only confirm that the image painted by Da Vinci is a false image of Christ, because the image in the Last Supper is too handsome, attractive and appealing that nobody will ignore.
Worst, the image which is resembling the image of Cesare Borgia being accepted by Christians as Christ’s image is an image of a product of illegitimacy, of one accused of killing his brother Giovanni Borgia and had sexual liaison with Sancha of Aragon, the wife of his younger brother Gioffre and an image of one who died in an ambush, after receiving a fatal injury from a spear and was thereafter stripped of luxurious garments, valuables and a leather mask covering half his face (disfigured possibly by syphilis during his late years) and finally, left lying naked, with just a red tile covering his genitals.[en.wiki16]
Clearly, therefore, the image that is being accepted as Christ by Christians is the image of one who died from fatal injury due to spear and left lying naked, with just a red tile covering his genitals and not the image of the one, who was crucified on the cross.
Finally, had it been that the second commandment of God (Exodus 20:4), which is also a divine warning, was obeyed, by not making images of anything in heaven, on earth or underneath the sea, said error could have been avoided by almost all Christians. Ironically, what remains as only truthful but deceitful image believed by Christians is the physical cross in honor of the cross constellation, which is likewise a violation of the second commandment of God.
In short, present Christians cannot boast of anything to support their allegation that they are deemed save in case of judgement.
Lie # 3: The Doctrines and Practices
Why the false doctrines and practices?
The ‘Jesus is Christ‘ and ‘Jesus is God‘ doctrines of Christians are gross falsities and products of evil deceptions to the highest degree because they are anchored on a false name and false image, which are discussed above and false holy trinity doctrine, which became the basis of various false doctrines and practices such as paganism and hypocrisy when praying, use of deceptive and dangerous “through Jesus name” in prayers and iconography or idolatry of the cross, saints and the alleged images of Christ and Mother Mary.
To re-stress, the theories that ‘Jesus is Christ’ and ‘Christ is God’ are not supported by history and scripture, respectively. It is because, historically, no Jesus name existed at the time Christ was born until he was crucified, thus, the impossibility of the Jesus Christ name. Whereas, the Christ is God doctrine is being belied by Hebrews 2:17-18, which state as follows:
17 Therefore, in all things He had to be made like His brethren, that He might be a merciful and faithful High Priest in things pertaining to God, to make propitiation for the sins of the people. 18 For in that He Himself has suffered, being tempted, He is able to aid those who are tempted (New International Version).
In verse 17, it is expressly stated that Christ, in all things, had to be made like his brethren. Also, in verse 18, he also suffered having been tempted. That being so, he cannot be logically considered as God because he was also tempted having been made, in all things, like his brethren. Consequently, therefore, the holy trinity doctrine has to fall because Christ is not considered as God based on Hebrews 2:17-18.
While it is true that the Word (referring to the messiah) was god in John 1:1, if co-related to John 1:14, he can no longer be considered as God, when he became human, due to lack of a qualifying verse in King James Version stating that he continued to be God in his capacity as a man, which is further reinforced by Hebrews 2:17-18. John 1:1 and John 1:14 state as follows:
1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was god. (John 1:1, KJV)
x x x
14 And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth. (John 1:14, KJV)
Notice also that in New International Version (NIV), an attempt is being made to reinforce the theory that Christ is God, when it inserted in John 1:18 the phrase “who is himself God”. It states:
18 No one has ever seen God, but the one and only Son, who is himself God and[b] is in closest relationship with the Father, has made him known.
International Standard Version has a unique way of inserting the phrase. It states:
18 No one has ever seen God. The uniquely existing God,[o] who is close to the Father’s side, has revealed him.
Whereas, English Standard Version (ESV) states that:
But, if you compare the NIV, ISV and ESV translations to King James Version, you will note the difference of the three versions to the latter. King James Version states:
18 No one has seen God at any time. The only begotten Son,[f] who is in the bosom of the Father, He has declared Him.
Based on the above translations, observe that the three (3) versions are in substantial conflict with King James Version, because they expressly state that the messiah is God but King James Version is clearly silent. How to resolve the conflict? To resolve it, Hebrews 2:17-18 can help, as the said verses confirm that Christ was made, in all things, as a man, who suffered because he was also tempted, therefore, he is not God.
Finally, therefore, based on the above disquisitions, the persona of Jesus Christ is doctrinally attended by three (3) forms of lies and evil deceptions through false name, false image and false doctrines and practices, which can be appropriately designated as trinity of lies and deceptions.
- Grammatical error in ‘Jesus is God’ doctrine
- Are you not scared if Jesus Christ is God?
- Christ logically says: ‘I am not God’
- JESUS or ‘J-ZEUS’ is not coming back
- Jesus is a False Christ
- ‘Jesus is Christ’ doctrine is a big traditional lie
- Christians are revering fictitious Jesus as God
- Christianity in general is a satanic cult
- ‘J’ is the biblical letter that kills
- Second part of ‘J’ is the biblical letter that kills
- Third part of ‘J’ is the biblical letter that kills
- Concluding part of ‘J’ is the biblical letter that kills
- Jesus is the biblical son of perdition
- “Excuse me, my name was pronounced Yahushua, not J-Zeus”