WORDatTheNet

Home » Religious Deception » Believing on ‘Jesus’ is a sure way to hell

Believing on ‘Jesus’ is a sure way to hell


Firmly and faithfully believing on the name Jesus as ‘The Christ’ is a sure way to hell. This proposition is based on the fact that the Greek name Ἰησοῦς (Iēsous), which is pronounced as ‘Yah-Zeus’ and origin of English name Jesus, was merely created by ancient Greek writers in 321 AD, when Emperor Constantine of the Roman Empire decreed the formation of Christianity.

False Image

Source of the photo: Yaohú Servo Yaohushua’s facebook page

Notably, under Emperor Constantine, Christianity was formed based on the combination of Hebrew and pagans’ belief that also combined the name of their respective God-YHWH and Zeus, which was adopted as the name of the messiah.

In their report, the The Nazarean Way Internet Ministry and The Essene-Nazarean Church of Mount Carmel in Missouri found out that the intention of adopting the Greek name Iēsous, as the name of Christ, was to peacefully unite the YHWH and Zeus believers. This is quoted as follows:

In other words, no matter the language spoken – Hebrew, Aramaic, Latin, Greek, et. al. – “He is always called by the name ‘Iēsous,’” pronounced YaH-Zeus; He was never called the common Jewish names “Joshua,” “Yeshua,” or “Yehoshua.” His name is “Iēsous” and it identifies the members of just one Royal Family prominent in Jewish history.

This well-known family of Israelites and Romans devised a plan to peacefully unite those who worshipped YHWH and those who worshipped Zeus. The solution: One family, descendants of the Sumerian and Babylonian “First Parents,” Ansar (“Heaven Prince”) and Kisar (“Earth Mother”). Their son was called “eNLiL” and his “sister-wife” was called “NiNLiL.”

In short, ancient Greek writers merely adopted the name Ἰησοῦς (Iēsous) as the name of the messiah based on an intention, which is to politically and religiously unite the YHWH and Zeus believers, when the New Testament was written in Greek. This is consistent to the fact that Ἰησοῦς (Iēsous) is not the correct transliteration of the name of Christ from Hebrew to Greek, which Hebrew name is transliterated to English as Yahushua.

Also, the intention to replace the original name of Christ with Greek name Ἰησοῦς (Iēsous) can be amply traced and proven in King James Version itself, as it confused itself with the use of the name Joshua with the name Jesus and vice versa.

In the old testament, which was translated direct from Hebrew, the name of the messiah was prophesied to be the same name as that of prophet Joshua, which name was transliterated by the King James Version to English. This is in Zechariah 6:12, which also refers to the messiah as ‘The Branch’.

Despite this prophecy however, the Greek writers generally adopted Ἰησοῦς (Iēsous) as the doctrinal name of the messiah in the New Testament. For reference, Zechariah 6:11-13 is quoted as follows:

11 Then take silver and gold, and make crowns, and set them upon the head of Joshua the son of Josedech, the high priest;

12 And speak unto him, saying, Thus speaketh the Lord of hosts, saying, Behold the man whose name is The Branch; and he shall grow up out of his place, and he shall build the temple of the Lord:

13 Even he shall build the temple of the Lord; and he shall bear the glory, and shall sit and rule upon his throne; and he shall be a priest upon his throne: and the counsel of peace shall be between them both. (KJV).

Above finding, which supports the act of intentional replacement of the name of the messiah with the desired name, being contrary to the prophecy, can be further exposed by the New Testament itself, specifically, in Acts 7:44-45 and Hebrews 4:7-8 of the King James Version. In these verses, it has to be noted that the name Joshua, the son of Nun, was replaced by the name of Jesus. They state as follows:

44 Our fathers had the tabernacle of witness in the wilderness, as he had appointed, speaking unto Moses, that he should make it according to the fashion that he had seen. 45 Which also our fathers that came after brought in with Jesus into the possession of the Gentiles, whom God drave out before the face of our fathers, unto the days of David; (Acts 7:44-45).

Again, he limiteth a certain day, saying in David, To day, after so long a time; as it is said, To day if ye will hear his voice, harden not your hearts.For if Jesus had given them rest, then would he not afterward have spoken of another day. (Hebrews 4:7-8)

Hence, it would even appear in the New Testament that the un-transliterated name of Joshua in Hebrew was replaced in Greek New Testament by Ἰησοῦς (Iēsous), which was finally transliterated to English name Jesus. These factual narrations in the King James Version would not support therefore the validity of the name Jesus. Rather, they logically support the notion that  there was intentional replacement of the name of Christ with another distinct name.

Finally, therefore, believing on the name Jesus as Christ is very fatal and will lead believers to hell instead of leading them to heaven. This is because Christians are being doctrinally taught to believe on Jesus as not only Christ but also as God, with the latter being grossly blasphemous.

Related articles:

>>>To Home Page to also proceed to The Forum

 

Advertisements

Archives

Categories

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 195 other followers

%d bloggers like this: