Swimming pool along the seashore
Homosexual and lesbian desires, just like pedophilia and bestiality, are viewed by laymen as psychological anomalies. In fact, even some of these involved individuals admit the abnormalities to be so, especially, if taking into consideration the anatomical aspect of the issue. Others would justify the aberrant sexual desires by proposing that ‘God created them to be so, hence, their behaviors are still within normal limits’. But others would cry out their grievances against the prevailing belief on sex for discriminating their desires by assailing the prevailing laws on marriage between man and woman, as if their abnormal behaviors deserve equal protection of law.
Based on the above belief and allegation, are these homosexuals and lesbians entitled to equal protection of law on marriage despite the proposition that ‘Lucifer is gay? How do we know that Lucifer is gay or doing homosexual acts? This can be shown through the ‘birds of the same feathers flock together‘ principle and through the ‘Sodom Gomorrah‘ behavior, which is not acceptable to the Almighty. Leviticus 18:22 states: “You are not to have sexual relations with a male as you would with a woman. It’s detestable. (NIV)”. Notably, the verse would simply mean that homosexuality is not acceptable, thus, the theory of some homosexuals about their being created by God, including their behavior, would easily fail. Also, if a certain behavior is hated, it is more likely to belong to the enemy, wherein Lucifer would easily qualify. Notice also, that said behavior is a major cause why there was a worldwide flood during Noah’s times.
Just after flood, the prohibition given to Noah by the Almighty, which was reiterated due to its being grossly detestable, is stated in Genesis 9:4. It states: “ 4 However, you are not to eat meat with its life—that is, its blood—in it! (ISV)”. A clearer version states: “4The one thing you must not eat is meat with blood still in it. I forbid this because the life is in the blood. (TEV)”. Most scholars may agree that the life that is being stated in Genesis 9:4 refers to both human and animal life, however, if you connect the verse to the prior (Genesis 9:2-3) and after verse (Genesis 9:5), you will reach a conclusion that the life therein refers only to human life.
Verses 2-3 and 5-6 state, as follows:
2All the animals, birds and fish will live in fear of you. They are all placed under your power. 3Now you can eat them, as well as green plants; I give them all to you for food.
5If anyone takes human life, he will be punished. I will punish with death any animal that takes a human life. 6Human beings were made like God, so whoever murders one of them will be killed by someone else.7 (Genesis 9:5-6, TEV).
Note that in verse 3, animals are given as food while in verse 5, taking of human life is prohibited, whereby, if is taken by human, he will be killed by someone else in accordance with verse 6, and if taken by animal, the animal is punished with death that implies animals have also life. However, there is no prohibition of taking animal life in these verses. Thus, there is indeed a great distinction between the treatment of animal and human life. Besides, the prohibition in verse 4 does not directly refer to drinking of blood.
On the other hand, if one would try to interpret the word “life” in verse 4 to include animal life, then, to be consistent, it is logical to re-state verses 2, 3 and 5, as follows:
2All the birds and fish will live in fear of you. They are all placed under your power. 3Now you can eat them, as well as green plants; I give them all to you for food. (Note: animal was deleted)
5If anyone takes human and/or animal life , he will be punished. I will punish with death any animal that takes a human and/or animal life. (Genesis 9:5TEV).(Note: animal was added)
Preceding premises considered, the “life”, which is stated in verse 4 , would only refer to human life to the exclusion of animal life. Otherwise, there would be a gross inconsistency of verse 4 to verses 2 and 3 and verse 5. That being so, it follows that the meat and blood, which are stated in the same verse (verse 4), would only refer to human. Therefore, the prohibition is logically “eating human meat with human blood still in it”, which is equivalent to “sexually eating human meat” as in “oral sex“or Filipino language idiom, which is “kumain ng hilaw na karne” (sexually eating the other’s genital).
If you connect the verses to Genesis 6:3, which says: “ 3 So the Lord said, “My Spirit won’t remain with human beings forever, because they’re truly mortal. Their lifespan will be 120 years.” and means that our bodies are actually the temple of God, you will clearly understand that homosexual activity, where the partner would sexually eat his partner’s genitalia is really detestable, especially, if the Spirit of God is in the human body. Thus, the conclusion that Lucifer is behind homosexuality and other activities of sinners is already no longer questionable.
Related articles:
- Today’s Sodom and Gomorrah
- USA: Forerunner in Sodomy
- Habakkuk 2 and Sodomy in US Constitution
- Constitution Aggravates Sodomy
- Pro-Sodomy Words: Spoken by Obama?
- France: Second Runner in Sodomy
- Vatican City: Inducer of sodomy
- United Kingdom: Next in the Doom List
- Brazil in the Doom List
- Philippines in Habakkuk 2 doom judgment
- April 2015 Nepal Earthquake: Sodom and Gomorrah Effect
- Archbishop against “Ungodly” Law
- Same-sex Relations in Reproductive Health Law
- “Parenthood” in Reproductive Health Law
- Onanism in Reproductive Health
- ‘Human rights’ and ‘women’s rights’: Are they real?
- Superbugs, HIV/AIDS and ‘oral sex’ behaviors
- ‘Same-sex marriage’ is unconstitutional
- Same-sex marriage violates real human rights
- The Oral Sex Theory
>>>To Home Page to also proceed to The Forum
