Home » Religious Deception
Category Archives: Religious Deception
Firmly and faithfully believing on the name Jesus as ‘The Christ’ is a sure way to hell. This proposition is based on the fact that the Greek name Ἰησοῦς (Iēsous), which is pronounced as ‘Yah-Zeus’ and origin of English name Jesus, was merely created by ancient Greek writers in 321 AD, when Emperor Constantine of the Roman Empire decreed the formation of Christianity.
Notably, under Emperor Constantine, Christianity was formed based on the combination of Hebrew and pagans’ belief that also combined the name of their respective God-YHWH and Zeus, which was adopted as the name of the messiah.
In their report, the The Nazarean Way Internet Ministry and The Essene-Nazarean Church of Mount Carmel in Missouri found out that the intention of adopting the Greek name Iēsous, as the name of Christ, was to peacefully unite the YHWH and Zeus believers. This is quoted as follows:
In other words, no matter the language spoken – Hebrew, Aramaic, Latin, Greek, et. al. – “He is always called by the name ‘Iēsous,’” pronounced YaH-Zeus; He was never called the common Jewish names “Joshua,” “Yeshua,” or “Yehoshua.” His name is “Iēsous” and it identifies the members of just one Royal Family prominent in Jewish history.
How were Philo of Alexandria and the ancient bible writers deceived Christians? More specifically, how were they able to arrive at a Greek name Ἰησοῦς (Iēsous), which is the Greek origin of Jesus, as the alleged name of the messiah?
In a search for historical Iēsous and Mary Magdalene, The Nazarean Way Internet Ministry and The Essene-Nazarean Church of Mount Carmel in Missouri reported:
“In 2002 we spotted a clue in Luke’s Gospel: a Pythagorean Sacred Number. A simple Internet search for “First Century Pythagoreans” led to Philo of Alexandria whom Clement called “The Pythagorean.” Philo taught a method of biblical interpretation that was known to and practiced by the Essenes.
Fifteen years of Following Philo–pulling threads from ancient texts, inscriptions, marble busts, and other artifacts – led to the history hidden in myths and fictions. “The Nazarean and the Magdalene” were not what we expected – in fact, they are much better (more…)
Is there trinity of lies and deceptions in Jesus Christ, which makes the name merely a product of man’s imagination and foolishness? Specifically, is Jesus Christ a real person in terms of authenticity of the name, authenticity of the image and validity of doctrines and practices being attached to him by false Christians?
Or was his name merely invented by the bible, his image merely created by Leonardo Da Vinci and the doctrines and practices being attached to him merely created by false Christians by deceptively stealing the Words of God and mis-using the story of the real messiah?
Related to the above issue is Habakkuk 2:12-14, which is a prophecy for Vatican City, being the headquarter of the Roman Catholicism. As a background, Habakkuk 2 prophecy refers to the judgment for United States (Habakkuk 2:4-8), United Kingdom (Habakkuk 2:15-17) Vatican City and France (Habakkuk 2:9-11).
Included in the prophecy is also a judgment for idolatrous nations, one of which is Brazil (Habakkuk 2:18-20), due to its “Christ the Redeemer” statue in Rio De Janeiro. Philippines and Nepal are also included. (more…)
Why is Iglesia ni Cristo (INC) a false Church of Christ? Simply, it is because it believes on a false name Jesus as the messiah. Also, based on Matthew 16:18, it cannot be considered as a Church of Christ for a reason that corruption, lies and other evil designs and practices are not the elements of a true church, which is being qualified in the verse, to wit: “the gates of hell shall not prevail against it”. Consequently, just like the Roman Catholic Church as previously discussed in the article entitled: Roman Catholic Church is the ‘Rock’, not the ‘Christ’s Church’, Iglesia ni Cristo can only claim as part of the ‘rock’ based on the statement of the messiah that “upon this rock I will build my church“.
Note: Shared from ABS-CBN.
Logically, therefore, Iglesia ni Cristo, which is a part of a ‘Christianity Rock‘, was only deceived by the Roman Catholicism to believe on such fictitious name Jesus and merely misrepresenting to the public that it is a ‘Church of Christ’. (more…)
If you are asking for something from the messiah, what will you get as an answer after you call him ‘Jesus‘? Of course, the reply would be logically like this: “Excuse me, my name was pronounced Yahushua, not J-Zeus…Since you are asking something from J-Zeus, whose name is closely related to Greek and Roman god Zeus, kindly expect help from Zeus, if he can, not from my heavenly Father”.
Note: Beware of the ‘sign of cross’ or ‘sign of the beast’ that may appear in the video.
What is the basis of the above proposition?
The proposition is based on the study of elijah.com. According to the study, the real name of the messiah, who was being called as the branch, could be traced as it is prophesied in the old testament, more specifically, in Zechariah 6:9-15, stating as follows: (more…)
Is the Roman Catholic Church really the church being referred in Matthew 16:18 or merely the rock? This issue is worth discussing because of the statement in the verse stating that: “upon this rock I will build my church” and the qualifying statement, which states that: “and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it”.
One major form of the gate of hell is fictitious name Jesus, which was merely created by the Roman Empire through Emperor Constantine. If the gates of hell have been prevailing and continue to prevail over the Roman Catholic Church, it becomes conclusive then that it is not the church that is being referred in Matthew 16:18. Thus, logically, Christ, in his personal capacity, has still to build His church and that the verse is actually referring to the building of the Church upon his return. (more…)
If the Aramaic name Yeshua, the alleged origin of Greek name Ἰησοῦς (Iēsous), which is the origin of English name Jesus, is directly transliterated to English as Joshua, it would logically follow that Jesus Christ, who is being believed by Christians as Christ as well as God, is deemed Greek, not a Jew.
It is because the name Jesus, in effect, has no Aramaic/Hebrew origin but only the Greek origin Ἰησοῦς (Iēsous).
Assuming a mistake may be invoked to justify the error of the alleged translation/transliteration from Aramaic language or Hebrew to Greek, said justification would be more admissible to prove that the error was intentionally committed, if you consider the following circumstantial facts, as follows:
1) The new testament where the name Jesus appears was originally written in Greeks rather than in Aramaic or Hebrew. Of course, Greek writers were more interested to reflect their own christ or god in the new testament, if given the opportunity. (more…)
Is the bible really holy and telling the truth that the true name of Christ is Jesus? These issues are worth discussing because billions of Christians are believing on the bible as holy and that allegedly, it contains the whole truth. Are these alleged holiness of the bible and truthfulness in it really so?
The hypothesis that maybe drawn as starting point for the discussion is that the bible is not holy, as it does not tell the whole truth.
First, we will settle the issue on alleged holiness of the bible by knowing first the meaning of word ‘holy’ as indicated in the old testament, more specifically in Leviticus 19:2, which states as follows:
2“Speak to all the congregation of the sons of Israel and say to them, ‘You shall be holy, for I the LORD your God am holy.(NIV)
For the above verse, how should the word ‘holy’ be understood as an adjective in relation to the subject that is being described in the verse? For example, the statement is: “You shall be holy” and “I the Lord your God am holy”. (more…)
Jesus Christ, who is a false Christ at the same time, a false God, is the biblical son of perdition being described in 2 Thessalonians 2:3-4, which states: “3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; 4 Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God”(KJV).
Jesus Christ is a false Christ considering that the name Jesus did not exist when Christ, who has a Hebrew name that is being pronounced as Yahushua, was born until he was crucified. In short, Jesus is a false name of Christ, Consequently, therefore, Jesus Christ is a false Christ.
Secondly, Yeshua, being the alleged Hebrew origin of Greek name Ἰησοῦς (Iēsous) that was finally transliterated to English name Jesus, if directly transliterated to English-that is-without passing through the Greek transliteration or translation, would result to Joshua, not Jesus. Therefore, Jesus is a false name of Christ, being obviously initially originating from a Greek name.
Also, if Jesus Christ is a false Christ, the more reason that he is a false God, even assuming that the wrong proposition that “Christ is God“, which is very objectionable because of Hebrews 2:17-18, is correct.
Hence, the proposition that Jesus Christ is both a false Christ and false God is logically acceptable.
Notice that verse 4 contains the literal descriptions of that man of sin, which descriptions are completely and consistently applicable to (more…)