Home » Religious Deception
Category Archives: Religious Deception
If there is a greatest sin on earth, there could also be a greatest lie on earth. What do you think, is it? Just to give you the ten (10) clues, they are as follows:
- First-it is being worshipped and/or served as God.
- Second-it exists in Roman Catholicism, Greek Orthodox Church and Christianity, in general.
- Third-it is traditional, meaning, it passed through generations and people receive it as truth, despite the fact that if discovered to be totally falsehood, the one who discovers may erupt like Mayon Volcano, which is presently erupting, or release the developing internal pressure, as he and his family, parents, relatives and neighbors were victimized by domestic and foreign liars and deceivers, who are, most probably, not aware that they are lying and deceiving others, thereby making them pathological liars.
- Fourth-many are preaching this lie.
- Fifth-it was devised by powerful liars and deceivers, who were guided by Satan.
- Sixth-it is a source of wealth.
- Seventh-it uses the people’s emotion.
- Eight-it is used to engaged in war, peace, debates, government, politics and almost in all human activities, coupled, ironically, by faith.
- Ninth-it uses the bible but,
- Tenth-the powerful liars and deceivers, including those deceived, were not able to detect that the bible itself had prophesied the lie, making them as fools.
The definition of sin is affected by dynamics of politics, just like in recent US government shutdown, otherwise known as Schumer after Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, or Donald Trump Shutdown, depending on whose opinion is asked, and, where furlough may affect government employees due to budgetary conflicts between Congress and the President.
In fact, Christian and Catholic teachers, preachers, priests, pastors, Christian leaders and ministers and others may have their own way of operationally defining sin. But, most probably, all of them would invoke the words in the bible to do it. Or shall we say-redefining sin by invoking the words in the bible in accordance with their respective will. And, specifically, they may subscribe to the alleged words of Jesus Christ in the bible to define or redefine sin. (more…)
Are Catholics and Christians really acknowledging the true messiah before others? The issue, which can be answered by a big NO, is very important because they are publicly professing that they are believers of Christ. More specifically, this is related to Matthew 10:32, which states: “Whoever acknowledges me before others, I will also acknowledge before my Father in heaven.” (Matthew 10:32, NIV).
It is a big NO because if the name Jesus Christ and his alleged image and all doctrines and practices being attached to him are products of evil deceptions, the said believers are, in effect, not acknowledging the true messiah before others.
Others may capitalize on the words found in the bible as sources of alleged truth. But, would they be enough when you attach or connect them to the identity of Jesus Christ, whose name did not ever exist when the messiah was here on earth? Of course, also, the answer is a big NO. That being so, the Jesus Christ entity is actually a traditional lie. And consequently, therefore, believers are dangerously gearing towards destruction or perdition and not salvation, because they will not be acknowledged by the son before the heavenly Father. (more…)
Due to influence of Greeks and Romans, Roman Catholics and Christians, worldwide, had been profaning the heavenly Father and putting His name in vain? And they did them despite of a warning that nobody, either Israelite or pagan, will be held guiltless if he or she will take His name in vain?
Well, this is a challenge to all thinking people. But most probably, some Roman Catholics and Christians will not even dare thinking to drive at a valid conclusion but would only invoke faith in false teachers as a big reason to drive at a conclusion.
For reference, Exodus 20:7 states: “7 Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain; for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain. (KJV)“. (more…)
Byzantine Emperor Constantine the Great is nicely featured by some writers as the first Emperor, who was Christianized and the one who stopped Christian persecution, which was brutally done by his predecessor Roman Emperor Diocletian. However, if Daniel 7 is thoroughly reviewed by relating it to history, it will show that he was actually the little horn prophesied in Daniel 7:8.
In Daniel 7:6, the third beast, which looks like a leopard, is described as having four wings and four heads, which was given authority to rule. It states:
6 “After that, I looked, and there before me was another beast, one that looked like a leopard. And on its back it had four wings like those of a bird. This beast had four heads, and it was given authority to rule.
If Sabbath law is taken into account, who is the real author of Catholicism in particular and the present Christianity in general? Many will say that Jesus Christ is the moving force behind or the author. Could it really be true? With all due respect to Catholics and Christians, this can not be true, at all, because there was no Jesus name that ever existed when the messiah was here on earth. That being so, even if everybody would shout that the force behind these belief systems is him, it would simply fail because Jesus Christ is a fictitious entity who was just created by the bible.
Who is Jesus Christ by the way?
All those defending the name Jesus justify the name to have originated from Yeshua, which is an Aramaic name. However, assuming that said name is in Hebrew, which others claim to be, the theory of those defending the name to have originated from Aramaic or Hebrew does not deserve any merit because in so far as name is concerned, what applies is transliteration and not translation, when converting it from one language to another.
Transliteration is defined as follows:
In the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed is the king. It is true also to various kingdoms of Christianity. They are blind because they can not see that only one sect of the many sects may be a true believer of God and the rest are lying, as there is no logical reason to have various sects if they are believing only on the same God. In short, Christianity or Christendom, if taken as a whole, is a confused belief system.
Also, they are blind because they can not see that their belief in Jesus Christ is merely delusional as there was no Jesus name that ever existed when the messiah was here on earth. And speaking of delusion, this is found in 2 Thessalonians 2:11 in relation to the previous verse, which states:
10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.
11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: (KJV)
If taking into account the factor of Sabbath law, Catholics and Christians, who practice ‘Sunday’ worship are considered only as avid supporters of Emperor Constantine and never as followers of the Almighty. Worst, they are only opportunistically utilizing the Words of the heavenly Father to support the “Sunday’ worship that was introduced by Emperor Constantine, who is already dead, at the same time, not even considering that the Almighty, who is living, deserves respect on the Sabbath law that He spoken.
The law of the Almighty states:
20 And God spoke all these words, saying:
2 “I am the Lord thy God, who have brought (more…)
The decree issued by Emperor Constantine the Great known as the dies Solis—day of the sun, “Sunday”—as the Roman day of rest (Codex Justinianus 3.12.2) had directly resulted to the present Sunday worship practices of Catholics and Christians. Historically, prior to its issuance, the Sun worshiping had already been part of the Roman cult system and quoting from Wikipedia, it states:
“Sol Invictus (“Unconquered Sun”) was the official sun god of the later Roman Empire and a patron of soldiers. On 25 December 274 AD the Roman emperor Aurelian made it an official cult alongside the traditional Roman cults. Scholars disagree about whether the new deity was a refoundation of the ancient Latin cult of Sol, a revival of the cult of Elagabalus, or completely new. The god was favored by emperors after Aurelian and appeared on their coins until Constantine I. The last inscription referring to Sol Invictus dates to AD 387, and there were enough devotees in the 5th century that the Christian theologian Augustine found it necessary to preach against them.”
Despite the opposition from early theologians in the 5th century because sun worshiping had already generated enough devotees, they were prevailed upon by sun worshipers and as a result, Sunday worship was installed into the fabric of Catholic and Christian teachings, which is still persisting today. (more…)