Home » Religious Deception (Page 3)
Category Archives: Religious Deception
The decree issued by Emperor Constantine the Great known as the dies Solis—day of the sun, “Sunday”—as the Roman day of rest (Codex Justinianus 3.12.2) had directly resulted to the present Sunday worship practices of Catholics and Christians. Historically, prior to its issuance, the Sun worshiping had already been part of the Roman cult system and quoting from Wikipedia, it states:
“Sol Invictus (“Unconquered Sun”) was the official sun god of the later Roman Empire and a patron of soldiers. On 25 December 274 AD the Roman emperor Aurelian made it an official cult alongside the traditional Roman cults. Scholars disagree about whether the new deity was a refoundation of the ancient Latin cult of Sol, a revival of the cult of Elagabalus, or completely new. The god was favored by emperors after Aurelian and appeared on their coins until Constantine I. The last inscription referring to Sol Invictus dates to AD 387, and there were enough devotees in the 5th century that the Christian theologian Augustine found it necessary to preach against them.”
Despite the opposition from early theologians in the 5th century because sun worshiping had already generated enough devotees, they were prevailed upon by sun worshipers and as a result, Sunday worship was installed into the fabric of Catholic and Christian teachings, which is still persisting today. (more…)
Many bible scholars and historians, without using their common sense, are convinced that Emperor Constantine the Great was the first Christian Emperor or the first Emperor who was converted to Christianity. They likewise agree that his alleged conversion to Christianity had put to stop the Christian persecution after he succeeded Emperor Diocletian. They further believe that the latter was a very brutal Christian persecutor. However, they failed to see the opposite because the only Emperor, who politically desecrated the Sabbath, which was officially adopted in Christendom, was Emperor Constantine thereby making him as the Great Deceiver.
By comparison, it is noted that the influence of Emperor Diocletian and his Tetrarchy or the “Rule of Four” on alleged very brutal persecution of Christians was short-lived while the influence of Emperor Constantine in desecrating the Sabbath day, which is personally against the Almighty, prevailed until this time. Hence, in effect, he is more brutal than Diocletian because his imprint had indoctrinated Catholics and Christians to likewise defile the Sabbath day.
The imprint of Emperor Constantine influence over Catholic and Christian beliefs is manifested even today by believers’ hope for blessing, especially during Christmas and New Year, which is negated in Isaiah 56:1-2. It is because the desecration of Sabbath Day has negative effect on blessings. It states, to wit; (more…)
How severe is the delusion of Filipino Catholics and Christians concerning Christmas? This could be answered either by theoretical or academic rhetoric or by what is actually happening to Filipinos during Christmas.
My friends used to greet me “Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year” during Christmas. As usual, I used to greet them back with the same Greetings before. But after realizing what is really in Christmas, I became hesitant to greet them with my usual greetings before and would greet them back with ‘good morning’ or ‘good afternoon’ or ‘good evening’ instead, just to let them feel that I am their friend. But neither could I tell them of craziness of Christmas. Otherwise, I expect rebuttal or be told as ‘kill joy’, etc.
What’s really in Christmas?
Many believed that Christmas is a celebration to commemorate or acknowledge the birth of Christ. This is good, as commemorating or acknowledging somebody’s birthday, especially if he is good, is indeed plausibly good. But whose birthday are Catholics and Christians celebrating for? So far, nobody can tell that December 25 is the date of birth of Christ, even renowned bible scholars. However, there is historical basis that December 25 is the celebrated birth date of Roman god Mithra, where Mithraism belief emanated or, as (more…)
Assuming that Jesus Christ was not merely created by the bible writers, how does he lie to Catholics, Christians and to the world? It is simply by way of falsely claiming that he is the way, the truth and the life and that he was crucified to save others from their sins, among others, when in fact and in truth, there was no Jesus Christ that ever lived about 2000 years ago. Why? It is because no Jesus name ever existed, when the messiah was here on earth.
Thus, despite the academic eloquence and deluded thinking of priests, pastors and ministers and insistence of believers, who have Jesus Christ delusion too, they can not overturn the fact that Jesus Christ is a false Christ and false God. It is so because truth, not like the act of electing public officials in a democracy, does not have to follow the majority rule. Simply put, the Jesus Christ entity is only a traditional lie and nothing more.
Assuming that Jesus Christ is not a fictitious person that was just created by the Christian bible, even his knees will bow to ‘Yahushua’ upon hearing his name. This proposition is based on Philippians 2:10-11, which psychologically caused political uproar of the Roman Empire, when it was in power, thus, the empire changed the name of the Son into Ἰησοῦς (Iēsous) in Greek. It was changed in order to alleviate the fear of kneeling down upon hearing his name.
Notice also that the name of the Father in the old testament was changed when the Hebrew scripture was translated to Koine Greek, which finally resulted to English Lord as noted in Isaiah 42:8. Although, there were various translations from Hebrew to Greek, Septuagint translation prevailed and, based on prevailing history, became the basis of early writers in compiling the old testament in Greek. (more…)
How severe is the ‘Jesus Christ’ delusion in Catholics and Christians? Is it more severe among Catholics? Or, is it more severe among born-again Christians, Methodists, Baptists, Protestants or members of other Christian sects ? Or, could it be that, in fact, there is no material difference in terms of severity in them?
Of course, the answer is expected to vary from one person to another. It is because, if you are a Catholic, born-again Christian, Methodist, protestant or member of other Christian sect, you will all definitely deny having ‘Jesus Christ’ delusion. In fact, all of you will definitely assert your respective truth, to the point of physically defending your alleged faith. However, because your doctrines and practices are too wide apart, it may only mean that only one of you is telling the truth and the rest are lying, (more…)
Firmly and faithfully believing in the name Jesus as ‘The Christ’ is a sure way to hell. This proposition is based on the fact that the Greek name Ἰησοῦς (Iēsous), which is pronounced as ‘Yah-Zeus’ and origin of English name Jesus, was merely created by ancient Greek writers in 321 AD, when Emperor Constantine of the Roman Empire decreed the formation of Christianity.
Notably, under Emperor Constantine, Christianity was formed based on the combination of Hebrew and pagans’ belief that also combined the name of their respective God-YHWH and Zeus, which was adopted as the name of the messiah.
In their report, the The Nazarean Way Internet Ministry and The Essene-Nazarean Church of Mount Carmel in Missouri found out that the intention of adopting the Greek name Iēsous, as the name of Christ, was to peacefully unite the YHWH and Zeus believers. This is quoted as follows:
In other words, no matter the language spoken – Hebrew, Aramaic, Latin, Greek, et. al. – “He is always called by the name ‘Iēsous,’” pronounced YaH-Zeus; He was never called the common Jewish names “Joshua,” “Yeshua,” or “Yehoshua.” His name is “Iēsous” and it identifies the members of just one Royal Family prominent in Jewish history.
How were Philo of Alexandria and the ancient bible writers deceived Christians? More specifically, how were they able to arrive at a Greek name Ἰησοῦς (Iēsous), which is the Greek origin of Jesus, as the alleged name of the messiah?
In a search for historical Iēsous and Mary Magdalene, The Nazarean Way Internet Ministry and The Essene-Nazarean Church of Mount Carmel in Missouri reported:
“In 2002 we spotted a clue in Luke’s Gospel: a Pythagorean Sacred Number. A simple Internet search for “First Century Pythagoreans” led to Philo of Alexandria whom Clement called “The Pythagorean.” Philo taught a method of biblical interpretation that was known to and practiced by the Essenes.
Fifteen years of Following Philo–pulling threads from ancient texts, inscriptions, marble busts, and other artifacts – led to the history hidden in myths and fictions. “The Nazarean and the Magdalene” were not what we expected – in fact, they are much better (more…)