Home » Posts tagged 'Christianity' (Page 2)
Tag Archives: Christianity
The ‘Constantine the Great’ Cross Deception
The main argument on ‘Constantine the Great’ Cross Deception is: “In case of conflict between the words concerning idolatry in the ten commandments written by God himself and the opinion spoken by St. Paul regarding ‘cross’ in Galatians 6:14 and 1 Corinthians 1:18, which one should prevail- is it the words written by God himself or the opinion spoken by St. Paul?” What is your answer?
Source: John Hagee Ministries Facebook page. Notice from the message that the cross, which is never necessary in the message if talking about God, is being featured contrary to the second commandment of God, which states the prohibition on idolatry on carved images or likeness of anything in heaven-in this case-in the likeness of the ‘southern cross constellation’ located in heaven.
Also, did St. Paul ever encourage ‘Christians’ to kneel before and give phrases to the physical cross, using the name of God in vain? The answer is in the negative.
If St. Paul did not teach God believers to kneel before and give phrases to the cross, then what are the Roman Catholics doing when they are placing the cross at the altar and in their belief system?
Also, the same image could be seen in cemeteries, streets, above the buildings, Lutheran Church, Baptist Church, in John Hagee Ministries Facebook page, which is featured in this article, and in other christian sect belief system.
In effect, can we consider a person phrasing the cross as followers of Christ or true Christians? Or can we consider him a ‘cross’ believer instead of a God believer?
Readers, yours is the decision.
If you are in doubt that for centuries Christianity was contaminated by Constantine The Great through the cross, it is very sure that Christ did not depend on physical cross, where he was crucified, for his existence or did not encourage followers to kneel before the cross.
Logically therefore, if you have the physical cross in your belief system you are not a follower of Christ or true Christian but a follower of Constantine the Great or follower of “Constantianity” or a true ‘Constantian’. (more…)
“Murderer” cross to “holy?” cross?
A “murderer” cross to “holy” cross-the God of Roman Catholicism? Was there a transformation of the “cross” to holiness? With all due respect to Roman Catholics and believers on the image of the cross, the logical proposition is: ” Roman Catholic “Alleged” Church had introduced to this world the combined force of life and death.
By calling it holy, the cross became potent in murdering bodies and souls. http://www.wordatthenet.com.-
These are the physical body of Christ and the cross, in a single system of faith-the Roman Catholicism. As a force of death, cross was instrumental in the death of Christ”.
When Christ died, he was resurrected to life by the Father in heaven but when the cross lost its force against early Christians, who were never afraid to die on the cross, it was resurrected to life by the Holy Father in Vatican City through the Roman Empire, by way of adopting it as a symbol of Christianity.
By comparison, Christ called the Father in heaven as “Father” but Roman Catholicism is calling the Father in Vatican City as “Holy Father”.
Also, the body of Christ is not being called holy but the cross became “holy”. Roman Catholicism called it “holy” cross. Hence, a killer became holy.
Aside from calling it holy, Roman Catholicism uses “The Name” of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit, whenever followers pray, by starting and ending the prayer with a “sign of the cross” and at the same time, uses “The Name” by reciting “In the name of the Father, of the Son, and the Holy Spirit..Amen”.
This ceremony spiritually put the image of the cross over and above “The name” considering that cross is only one and “The Name” being quoted pertains to three persons, thus, the cross, by way of a traditional deception, is being phrased three time (3x) more than “The Name”.
Also, the symbolism in prayer has the semblance of (more…)
Pope attacks “trickle-down” theories?
Pope Francis totally lacks any legal personality to attack the “trickle-down” theories based on his alleged justifiable and moral grounds. Nor has the rights to utter words against “money”, any person or anything in heaven, on earth and underneath the sea.
Attacking other’s immorality without admitting his own immorality is foul. http://www.wordatthenet.com
Above proposition is logical, unless, he attacks first the “holy” cross, “holy” rosary, rosary beads and strings, and every Roman Catholic idols, e.g images and statues, which are being promoted by Roman Catholic Alleged Church.
He should also return first the title of the “Holy Father” to the real owner, including all the donations, monetary or proprietary, and all the “moneys” that the Roman Catholic alleged church had benefited in selling deceptive images, statues and candles, etc and all the fees paid for baptisms, masses, weddings, burials, etc, to all deceived followers.
The Pope should likewise civilly compensate all the victims of Roman Catholicism and homosexual priests and all nuns and sisters, who sacrificed their (more…)
Religious Deception in General
One significant aspect of religious deception is that once you become a victim of it, everything maybe lost. It is because you become an enemy and substantially separated from God.
Religious deception can be seen through a circular glass roof. http://www.wordatthenet.com.
Anytime, you are a target of a curse-the destruction through calamities, e.g earthquake, typhoons, diseases, wars, and famine.
On the part of the deceiver, his success is not only measured by monetary value, which is merely incidental, but, more spiritually appreciated by God’s enemy, of having deprived the victim of the spiritual “truth”.
Unfortunately, majority of these victims do not feel as a victim and may even protect the deceiver. Because, the latter appears to be cloth with authority having achieved it through substantial years of studies, thus, given publicly the privilege as a bearer of truth.
That’s why, they seem to be publicly blameless and saintly. But deeply, when facts, e.g, (more…)
WORDatTheNet 