Home » Posts tagged 'Cross'
Tag Archives: Cross
Assuming that Jesus Christ was not merely created by the bible writers, how does he lie to Catholics, Christians and to the world? It is simply by way of falsely claiming that he is the way, the truth and the life and that he was crucified to save others from their sins, among others, when in fact and in truth, there was no Jesus Christ that ever lived about 2000 years ago. Why? It is because no Jesus name ever existed, when the messiah was here on earth.
Thus, despite the academic eloquence and deluded thinking of priests, pastors and ministers and insistence of believers, who have Jesus Christ delusion too, they can not overturn the fact that Jesus Christ is a false Christ and false God. It is so because truth, not like the act of electing public officials in a democracy, does not have to follow the majority rule. Simply put, the Jesus Christ entity is only a traditional lie and nothing more. (more…)
What’s in a cross for you to die for just like in the case of a flag? Also, is it proper to connect cross to the identity of Christ, as if without it in a belief system, the believer can no longer be called Christian as if Christ himself is dependent on the existence of the cross? Also, what is a crossian?
These questions are related to how deeply humanity was deceived to believe on something, which is unnecessary and can qualify one to be foolish, because, while he is admitting as a Christian, his action and belief system are not based on the doctrines of Christ, more specifically, about the cross. Notably, being an image, the cross is in blatant violation of the second commandment of God.
Also, Christ did not command the apostles to build a cross or his alleged image to honor him, so it does not logically follow that once you have a cross in your belief system, you are a follower of Christ. In fact, you must be properly called a crossian, not as a Christian, because Christ did not tell you or your ancestor to build his cross in memory of him.
In Luke 22:19-20, Christ instructed his apostles to focus on his sacrificial body being represented by bread in memory of him, as follows: (more…)
The main argument on ‘Constantine the Great’ Cross Deception is: “In case of conflict between the words concerning idolatry in the ten commandments written by God himself and the opinion spoken by St. Paul regarding ‘cross’ in Galatians 6:14 and 1 Corinthians 1:18, which one should prevail- is it the words written by God himself or the opinion spoken by St. Paul?” What is your answer?
Also, did St. Paul ever encourage ‘Christians’ to kneel before and give phrases to the physical cross, using the name of God in vain? The answer is in the negative.
If St. Paul did not teach God believers to kneel before and give phrases to the cross, then what are the Roman Catholics doing when they are placing the cross at the altar and in their belief system?
Also, the same image could be seen in cemeteries, streets, above the buildings, Lutheran Church, Baptist Church, in John Hagee Ministries Facebook page, which is featured in this article, and in other christian sect belief system.
In effect, can we consider a person phrasing the cross as followers of Christ or true Christians? Or can we consider him a ‘cross’ believer instead of a God believer?
Readers, yours is the decision.
If you are in doubt that for centuries Christianity was contaminated by Constantine The Great through the cross, it is very sure that Christ did not depend on physical cross, where he was crucified, for his existence or did not encourage followers to kneel before the cross.
Logically therefore, if you have the physical cross in your belief system you are not a follower of Christ or true Christian but a follower of Constantine the Great or follower of “Constantianity” or a true ‘Constantian’. (more…)
Mafia members were recently excommunicated by Pope Francis. Is it nice and spiritually healthy? How about excommunicating also the pedophile priests and all Roman Catholics who kneel before the cross and other Roman Catholic idols? Because if the violent acts of Mafia members are primarily directed against their fellowmen, which is disobedience to the words of God, ‘oral sex’ mentality or pedophilia of catholic priests and idolatry of Roman Catholics are acts that are primarily directed against God.
In other words, Mafia’s acts of violence and pedophilia and idolatry in Roman Catholicism are both against the words of God with the latter being worst than the former considering the intention and recipient of the acts.
Notably, idolatry is forbidden in the scripture, which states among others, as follows:
“You shall not make for yourself a carved image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.(Exodus 20:4, English Standard Version).
8I alone am the Lord your God. No other god may share my glory, I will not let idols share my phrase. (Isaiah 42:8, TEV)
8The Lord punished his people by sending them into exile. He took them away with a cruel wind from the east. 9But Israel’s sin will be forgiven only when the stones of pagan altars are ground up like chalk, and no more incense altars or symbols of goddess Asherah are left. (Isaiah 27:8-9, TEV)
Also, note that the cross, statues and images of alleged Mother Mary, Christ and the saints, including rosary beads and strings (more…)
Why are the cross and rosary considered as gross insults to God? Historically, the cross was introduced in 312 A.D by Constantine the Great, who was a Roman Emperor, while the rosary was introduced by St. Dominic at the time of the “Albigensian Crusade or Cathar Crusade (1209–1229), which was a 20-year military campaign initiated by Pope Innocent III to eliminate Catharism in Languedoc, in the south of France. x x x “(Wikipedia).
Both were later deceptively called ‘holy’ by the Roman Catholicism.
The use of a physical cross as a sign and symbol emerged gradually in Christian practices.
While the theology of the cross is taught by Paul and the sign of the cross for baptism and protection is reported fairly early, the use of a physical cross rarely appears before the fourth century.(1)
At that time, two events involving Constantine led to the use of a physical cross or cross form by the state, the emerging church, and Christians.
In the first event, Constantine reports having a vision of a sign, either while sleeping or seen in the sky, that came to be identified with Christ. With the vision and dream he saw the words, In Hoc Signo Vinces, “In this sign conquer”, and assured his victory over Maxentius. He placed the sign at the top of his standard and on the shields of his men and won the battle of Milvian Bridge outside of Rome in 312. (2)This victory made Constantine the emperor of the West. He surprised everyone by openly supporting (more…)
It is not the cross but the sacrificial death of Christ on the cross that had saved and will save believers in Christ. Therefore, the proposition that the cross is a manifestation or extension of the ‘power of God’ has no logical basis for Roman Catholics to kneel before it.
Besides, said teaching simply limits the limitless power of God because His power manifests in everything.
Also, based on the above premise, it follows that it is not good for one to serve, kneel and bow down before the cross located in the altar, streets, etc. while attending mass or praying publicly in the streets or inside the alleged churches or Roman Catholic buildings.
Neither, it is good for one to make a ‘sign of the cross’ when praying because by doing so, the southern cross is being revered instead of God. In other words, one could become a ‘cross believer’ instead of a ‘God believer’ by doing so.
You can’t be considered at the same time (more…)
What are the historical achievements of the ‘cross’ and ‘rosary’ for them to be elevated to the status of ‘holiness’? Do we have any historical answer? In the case of the cross, historically, Christ and some of his followers were crucified at the cross.
Will such achievements of killing the true believers of God by way of the cross enough to make it holy? Is it logical then to call it unholy killer, having been used to kill and therefore, an instrument which is in conflict with Christ and his followers?
In the case of rosary, history tells that it was used to convert Albigensians to Roman Catholicism.”x x x it was given to the Church by St. Dominic, who had received it from the Blessed Virgin as a means of converting the Albigensians and other sinners.” (theholyrosary.org)
But who are these Albigensians?