Home » Posts tagged 'False Christ'
Tag Archives: False Christ
Is there trinity of lies and deceptions in Jesus Christ, which makes the name merely a product of man’s imagination and foolishness? Specifically, is Jesus Christ a real person in terms of authenticity of the name, authenticity of the image and validity of doctrines and practices being attached to him by false Christians?
Or was his name merely invented by the bible, his image merely created by Leonardo Da Vinci and the doctrines and practices being attached to him merely created by false Christians by deceptively stealing the Words of God and mis-using the story of the real messiah?
Related to the above issue is Habakkuk 2:12-14, which is a prophecy for Vatican City, being the headquarter of the Roman Catholicism. As a background, Habakkuk 2 prophecy refers to the judgment for United States (Habakkuk 2:4-8), United Kingdom (Habakkuk 2:15-17) Vatican City and France (Habakkuk 2:9-11).
Included in the prophecy is also a judgment for idolatrous nations, one of which is Brazil (Habakkuk 2:18-20), due to its “Christ the Redeemer” statue in Rio De Janeiro. Philippines and Nepal are also included.
The verses for Vatican City state as follows:
12 You are doomed! You founded a city on crime and built it up by murder. 13 The nations you (more…)
Jesus Christ, who is a false Christ at the same time, a false God, is the biblical son of perdition being described in 2 Thessalonians 2:3-4, which states: “3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; 4 Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God”(KJV).
Jesus Christ is a false Christ considering that the name Jesus did not exist when Christ, who has a Hebrew name that is being pronounced as Yahushua, was born until he was crucified. In short, Jesus is a false name of Christ, Consequently, therefore, Jesus Christ is a false Christ.
Secondly, Yeshua, being the alleged Hebrew origin of Greek name Ἰησοῦς (Iēsous) that was finally transliterated to English name Jesus, if directly transliterated to English-that is-without passing through the Greek transliteration or translation, would result to Joshua, not Jesus. Therefore, Jesus is a false name of Christ, being obviously initially originating from a Greek name.
Also, if Jesus Christ is a false Christ, the more reason that he is a false God, even assuming that the wrong proposition that “Christ is God“, which is very objectionable because of Hebrews 2:17-18, is correct.
Hence, the proposition that Jesus Christ is both a false Christ and false God is logically acceptable.
Notice that verse 4 contains the literal descriptions of that man of sin, which descriptions are completely and consistently applicable to (more…)
Up against the proposition alleging that ‘Jesus is a fictitious name and therefore, Jesus Christ is a false Christ’, pro-Jesus proponents may also defend the falsehood in addition to other deceptive opinions by submitting the contrary proposition that: ‘The true Hebrew name of Christ is not critically needed in salvation, as the “saving truth’ of God could pass through another ordained or chosen man in addition to Jesus, who was allegedly ordained by God as the first Christ’.
Jesus refers to the extraordinary man born immaculately and ordained by God to be the first Christ (or Messiah) to deliver God’s Truth (Word) to humanity. Therefore, while Jesus’ life and messages/teachings are divine and relevant to man’s salvation, as these are wholly from the Father, Jesus, being merely a Spirit-filled man who fully expressed the will, wisdom, word and authority of God, should never be the center of devotion. Christ is not an exclusive reference to Jesus, as it is the condition wherein any ordained or chosen man (even to the present time) is filled with God’s Spirit (Word) for the purpose of delivering God’s “Saving Truth” to humanity. Christ is the omnipotence and omnipresence of the ONENESS in God. If one is Christ (more…)
What’s wrong in Christianity, Christendom, Christmas and other doctrines and practices using the name of Christ? Conclusively, in a singular form of deception, Christendom and the world were deceived by Roman Catholicism to finally believe that Jesus (J-Zeus) is Christ, despite the lack of any historical basis.
It is as if, Christians are also believing that Christ was born as a citizen of United States or United Kingdom who adopted an English name or the English language had been in existence in Bethlehem when Christ was born until he was crucified at the Calvary.
Truly, ‘Jesus is Christ’ doctrine is false, as there was no person with a name ‘Jesus’ Christ that existed prior, during or immediately after crucifixion of Christ.
Also, take note that Christ has a Hebrew name but Roman Catholicism, without any valid reason at all, doctrinally opted to adopt the Greek translation Ἰησοῦς (Iēsous), which was finally transliterated to Jesus, as if it is the original name of Christ and that Christ was born and crucified as Greek. (more…)
True or False? Question: The name ‘Jesus’ was in existence in Bethlehem, Judah and inside or outside the Roman Empire, when Christ was born until he was crucified. What is your answer? True or False?
If your answer is ‘True’ then Jesus is the True Christ but if your answer is ‘False’ then Jesus is a False Christ.
But, if you say and testify that the name ‘Jesus’ had been in existence at that time, then you are telling a big lie because the Greek writers who wrote the new testament after the crucifixion of Christ are one in naming him Ἰησοῦς (Iēsous). In short, the name Jesus merely resulted from transliteration of a Greek name.
Allegedly, the Greek translation was taken from a Hebrew name of Christ. But if deeply scrutinized, as it would not appear to be deceptive if you are not conscious of pagan god Zeus as a possible subject of worship, a danger may be noticed because the name Iēsous sounds more to have a root name of ‘sous’ (Zeus).
Besides, the Hebrew name can be translated/transliterated to English direct from Hebrew or without passing the Greek translation. Obviously, by doing so, even by transliteration, the Hebrew name would less likely result to ‘Jesus’. Thus, it is apparent that the Greek translation, which became the basis of the transliterated name ‘Jesus’ had contaminated the name to favor Zeus by deceptively inserting the root name of said pagan god.
Is Jesus or ‘J-ZEUS’ really not coming back? This question is relevant today as Christians and the world were deceptively made to believe by Roman Catholicism through Greek, Latin and English writers, who revised the Hebrew name of Christ in the bible through transliteration, that Jesus will come back.
In fact, King James and other versions of the bible emphatically convinced Christians and crossians to believe in the name ‘Jesus’, without honestly telling them that such name is nowhere to be found in Bethlehem or Judah or surrounding nations or even in Rome, when Christ was born and until he was crucified.
Naturally, as no ‘Jesus’ or ‘J-ZEUS’ had departed 2000 years ago in the first place, then, no man with such a name is expected to return.
This is how Roman Catholicism deceived the world and everybody is faithfully foolish to follow the lies of the Pope and the Roman Catholic leaders.
That’s why the Spokesman for the Vatican is honest in saying in substance that ‘no Jesus is coming back’, without telling honestly however, that Jesus is not the son of God, but may be the son of Greek demigod ZEUS. (more…)