Home » Posts tagged 'Jesus Christ'
Tag Archives: Jesus Christ
Are Catholics and Christians worshipping the Creator or are they deceived to worship Greek pagan god Zeus using tradition and the bible? This issue will be tackled in this article with preliminary question by invoking John 14:6, which provides that “6 Jesus said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.” Is the bible really telling the truth? No. It is because the Zeus-Dionysus-Jesus Christ connection is obvious in today’s worship and religious practices though the genitive Dios, more specifically, through the Filipino term ‘Diyos’, which originated from the influence of Spaniards, who brought the Roman Catholic beliefs to Filipinos.
Wikipedia (Etymology section) describes the Zeus-Dionysus connection through the ‘dio’ element in Dionysus, as follows:
“The dio- element has been associated since antiquity with Zeus (genitive Dios). The earliest attested form of the name is Mycenaean Greek 𐀇𐀺𐀝𐀰, di-wo-nu-so, written in Linear B syllabic script, (more…)
Based on historical facts, no Jesus name ever existed, when the messiah was here in earth. Hence, despite it is written in the bible and strong delusions of professing biblical scholars, the rejection of Jesus Christ name as the only way to the Father is justified, because, spiritually, the Jesus Christ entity is virtually impossible to have existed, when the messiah was here on earth. What is then the name of the right way to the eternal Father? The applicable verses in this case is John 14:6-7, stating that:
6 Yahushua (
Jesus) said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. 7 If you had known me, you would have known my Father also.[a] From now on you do know him and have seen him.”(John 14:6-7, ESV Revised)
in relation to Zechariah 6:11-12, stating that:
11Then take some silver and gold to make a crown and set it on the head of Yahushua (
Joshua) son of Jehozadak, the high priest. 12 Then say to him, ‘The Lord who rules over all says, “Look – here is the man whose name is Branch, who will sprout up from his place and build the temple of the Lord.(Zechariah 6:11-12, NET bible Revised)
Before discussing the “The Only Way to the Father“, let’s review the “What’s in a Jewish or Greek-Roman Name” sub-article, which is the first sequel of the (more…)
What’s in a Jewish or Greek-Roman name? This topic is intimately related to the issue on the falsehood of the name Jesus Christ. This is critically important, as many are being led to worship the name Jesus Christ. Preachers would even shout, declaring him worthy of praise, worship and obedience.
Is there really power in his name? Or, basing on truth, not on doctrinal coercion or delusion, myth, fiction or imagination, is it logical, at all, to praise and worship a created, evolving and fictitious name?
Conflicts and controversies may arise from the issue, but truth seekers and fiction lovers are just invited to freely and academically test the validity or spirit of argument, just to see for themselves the truth, for, perhaps, many will find the counter-arguments, not acceptable, but in the end, it’s not pride and deception, but only truth and being saved that have to matter.
Today, many people from different races, religious backgrounds and political affiliations believe in a ‘Jesus Christ’ entity as God. However, to consider it not merely a myth, fiction or fallacy, the proposition, belief or opinion must have factual and/or logical bases, not merely based on false faith or dubious or questionable bible. Also, many are believing that he is ‘the way, the truth and the life‘. And, as believed, nobody could come to the Father, except through him. In short, allegedly, he is the only way to the Father. Also, he is said to be (more…)
If there is a greatest sin on earth, there could also be a greatest lie on earth. What do you think, is it? Just to give you the ten (10) clues, they are as follows:
First-it is being worshipped and/or served as God.
Third-it is traditional, meaning, it passed through generations and people receive it as truth, despite the fact that if discovered to be totally falsehood, the one who discovers may erupt like Mayon Volcano, which is presently erupting, or release the developing internal pressure, as he and his family, parents, relatives and neighbors were victimized by domestic and foreign liars and deceivers, who are, most probably, not aware that they are lying and deceiving others, thereby making them pathological liars.
The definition of sin is affected by dynamics of politics. In fact, Christian and Catholic teachers, preachers, priests, pastors, Christian leaders and ministers and others may have their own way of operationally defining sin.
But, most probably, all of them would invoke the words in the bible to do it. Or shall we say-redefining sin by invoking the words in the bible in accordance with their respective will. And, specifically, they may subscribe to the alleged words of Jesus Christ in the bible to define or redefine sin.
For the Roman Catholics, they define sin into two types-mortal and venial sin, with the mortal sin as the severe form. In short, they are classifying sins according to the severity. However, to redefine sin, they initially revised the Ten Commandments of God, e.g, by adopting iconography, which is the other word for idolatry as prelude to adopting cross as sign of Constantinian Christianity and other images; changing the name of the son and translating the name of the Father into Lord and applying the term also to the alleged son, at the same time, adopted the Sun Worshiping Law or Sunday Law passed by Emperor Constantine, by renaming it as Sunday Worship Day or Lord’s Day, in alleged celebration of the new life of the world in Christ resurrection, as if Christ had resurrected every week.
However, despite the efforts of Roman Catholicism to hide the true nature of the Sunday Worship Day, the political and influential imprint of the law passed by Emperor Constantine on March 7, 321, otherwise known as dies Solis—day of the sun, “Sunday”—as the Roman day of rest (Codex Justinianus 3.12.2), can not be prevailed upon by its doctrinal and philosophical fiat, because it states as follows:
“On the venerable day of the Sun let the magistrates and people residing in cities rest, and let all workshops be closed. In the country however persons engaged in agriculture may freely and lawfully continue their pursuits because it often happens that another day is not suitable for grain-sowing or vine planting; lest by neglecting the proper moment for such operations the bounty of heaven should be lost.”
Besides, the Sabbath Law has to be interpreted in relation to the tradition of Israelites, who had particular calendar distinct from Romans, not in relation to the tradition of Romans, where another calendar is observed. In short, Roman Catholicism redefine sin by revising the Commandments of God, e.g, about the name, operationally revising the act of idolatry, etc, with the use of another calendar, which is not related to the Sabbath Law, to satisfy its political, economic and philosophical needs. In other words, Roman Catholicism had redefined sin by committing a much graver sin by way of revising the law and the name of the Father and the son, which is more than the classified mortal sin.
And for the other sects of Christianity, which also adopted the doctrinal revisions of the Commandments of God, by way of adopting the Sun Worship Day and the cross image and the revised name ‘Jesus Christ’, they likewise committed the graver sin, more than that of mortal sin, because they have no authority, whatsoever, to do such act, as they are not God.
Finally, as a result of the revision of law, specifically, about the created images, and revision of the name of the Son, believers are hooked into believing in Jesus, whose name did not ever exist when the messiah was here on earth and in his alleged but actually image of Cesare Borgia, the son of Pope Alexander VI, who was not crucified but killed in an ambush.
What is then the greatest sin on earth today?
Well, the greatest sin today is believing on lies as God. It is because Jesus Christ, whose name is a lie and his alleged image, which is also a lie, are being worshipped not only as the Son of God but likewise as God through the trinity doctrine. In short, these lies are being worshiped and served as God.
And, this is prophesied in Romans 1:25, which states as follows:
“They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator–who is forever praised. Amen. (New International Version)“
This type of sin had evolved into the present form because what was done in the past by Catholic and Christian leaders was making or creating lies as God.
- Jesus is the biblical son of perdition
- “Excuse me, my name was pronounced Yahushua, not J-Zeus”
- Trinity of lies & deceptions in Jesus Christ
- Philo of Alexandria and other ancient bible writers: Source of deception?
- Believing on ‘Jesus’ is a sure way to hell
- ‘Jesus Christ’ delusion in Catholics and Christians
- Jesus Christ’s knees will bow to ‘Yahushua’
- How Jesus Christ lie to Catholics, Christians and to the world?
- How severe is Filipino delusion of ‘Christmas’?
- Grammatical error in ‘Jesus is God’ doctrine
- Are you not scared if Jesus Christ is God?
- Christ logically says: ‘I am not God’
- JESUS or ‘J-ZEUS’ is not coming back
- Jesus is a False Christ
- ‘Jesus is Christ’ doctrine is a big traditional lie
- Christians are revering fictitious Jesus as God
- Christianity in general is a satanic cult
Are Catholics and Christians really acknowledging the true messiah before others? The issue, which can be answered by a big NO, is very important because they are publicly professing that they are believers of Christ. More specifically, this is related to Matthew 10:32, which states: “Whoever acknowledges me before others, I will also acknowledge before my Father in heaven.” (Matthew 10:32, NIV).
It is a big NO because if the name Jesus Christ and his alleged image and all doctrines and practices being attached to him are products of evil deceptions, the said believers are, in effect, not acknowledging the true messiah before others.
Others may capitalize on the words found in the bible as sources of alleged truth. But, would they be enough when you attach or connect them to the identity of Jesus Christ, whose name did not ever exist when the messiah was here on earth? Of course, also, the answer is a big NO. That being so, the Jesus Christ entity is actually a traditional lie. And consequently, therefore, believers are dangerously gearing towards destruction or perdition and not (more…)
Due to influence of Greeks and Romans, Roman Catholics and Christians, worldwide, had been profaning the heavenly Father and putting His name in vain? And they did them despite of a warning that nobody, either Israelite or pagan, will be held guiltless if he or she will take His name in vain?
Well, this is a challenge to all thinking people. But most probably, some Roman Catholics and Christians will not even dare thinking to drive at a valid conclusion but would only invoke faith in false teachers as a big reason to drive at a conclusion.
For reference, Exodus 20:7 states: “7 Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain; for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain. (KJV)“
Also, quoted below is Ezekiel 22:26, stating that: (more…)
If Sabbath law is taken into account, who is the real author of Catholicism in particular and the present Christianity in general? Many will say that Jesus Christ is the moving force behind or the author. Could it really be true? With all due respect to Catholics and Christians, this can not be true, at all, because there was no Jesus name that ever existed when the messiah was here on earth. That being so, even if everybody would shout that the force behind these belief systems is him, it would simply fail because Jesus Christ is a fictitious entity who was just created by the bible.
Who is Jesus Christ by the way?
All those defending the name Jesus justify the name to have originated from Yeshua, which is an Aramaic name. However, assuming that said name is in Hebrew, which others claim to be, the theory of those defending the name to have originated from Aramaic or Hebrew does not deserve any merit because in so far as name is concerned, what applies is transliteration and not translation, when converting it from one language to another.
Transliteration is defined as follows:
“Systematic transliteration is a mapping from one system of writing into another, typically grapheme to grapheme. Most transliteration systems are one-to-one, so a reader who knows the system can (more…)