Home » Posts tagged 'Jesus'
Tag Archives: Jesus
Believers worship the name Jesus, without valid logical reason, at all, or simply, based on questionable faith. Are they aware of the ‘name of blasphemy’ in Revelation 13? Or are they just comfortable believing in a lie? Of course, not all will admit that Jesus name is the name of blasphemy, but, if history is reviewed, with common sense and without bias or free from delusion, it will point to a Jesus name, which is being worshiped by Roman Catholics, Orthodox believers and Christians. Bible scholars, teachers and christian leaders would even shout in reverence of this name, not aware that it is the name of blasphemy.
Historically, Jesus name came from Greek name Iesous, which was initially transliterated to Iesus in the 1611 King James Version. At that time, letter “J” was not yet in existence in the English language. The name is also transliterated to Filipino as Hesus or Hesu or Esus, Esu, Iesus, Issa in other languages. Also, some historians quote Hesus or Esus as the name of a Celtic and Gallo-Roman god. It is described in wikipedia. Others describe Iaso, as the female counterpart name of Iesous in Greek, hence, in all probability, Jesus name did (more…)
There are different views on the two beasts in Revelation 13. But none of them points to Emperor Constantine I and his political-religious empire and Jesus Christ and Christianity, which are, in reality, being referred in the verses.
Objectively, the identity of the two beasts was ascertained through review of history and connecting it to the verses. For example, Revelation 13:1-2 (KJV) gives us the clue on the first beast. The verses state:
13 And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.
2 And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.
Verse 1 describes the rising up of the first beast out of the sea, which is a figurative description of the origin of the first beast. This is better understood, if co-related to the description of the second beast in Revelation 13:11, where it is described to “come up out of the earth“. Obviously, sea is liquid or unsolidified or not stable. In contrast, earth or land is solid or firm. These two describe the condition of the predecessor empire, where the first and second beast emanated, respectively. Notice that the description of the predecessor of the first beast (more…)
If you are God and everyday, you are hearing people praising and worshipping a name, which is not your name, what will you feel? Will you be happy? This sub-article of Shocking truth about ‘Jesus Christ’ name mainly focuses on the origin of the names ‘Jesus’ and ‘Christ’. This is to know, whether or not, the names deserve to be praised. Incidentally, this will give us a clue on people, who are more than atheists and satanists.
Of course, the names ‘Jesus’ and ‘Christ’ are found in the English bible. Thus, without controverting facts, which will put the bible in question, the names are presumed to be the truth. But granting for the sake of argument that said names are, in fact, written in the bible, with spiritual guide, did it ever occur to believer’s mind that maybe the spirit that guided is evil and the names written therein are corrupted? It is because the English and Christian name Jesus Christ is playing an important role in a narration of past events, during which time, the present English language, Catholicism and Christianity were not yet in existence.
In short, how can a christian and english name Jesus Christ evolve into existence as the name of the son, when the messiah was neither a Christian or an Englishman?
Thus, consequently, for believing in a Jesus Christ name, which did not exist when the messiah was here on earth, Catholics and Christians are deemed (more…)
Adults have confusing views on the personal name of the Father. Some says Yahweh, some alleges Jehovah, some calls Him through a title Lord, God, Adonai or Elohim. If you notice, almost everybody has his own way of naming the heavenly Father. And they are not aware that, in addition to the initial “Yah” sound in Hallelu-YAH or “Praise Yah” that is stated in Revelation 19, the last sound of the name of the Father is heard in a newborn’s cry. In essence, if anyone could only ask the newborn about the name of the Father, he or she will answer, correctly, half of it, more than the adults or differently from what is being taught to adults.
One of the elements of the name of the Father is life, which is externally manifested by sound ‘UHA’ in a newborn’s cry. It is so, it being the sound of presence of life in a newborn, upon birth. No wonder that there are verses, which show the Father’s love of children, whose innocence is (more…)
If Sabbath law is taken into account, who is the real author of Catholicism in particular and the present Christianity in general? Many will say that Jesus Christ is the moving force behind or the author. Could it really be true? With all due respect to Catholics and Christians, this can not be true, at all, because there was no Jesus name that ever existed when the messiah was here on earth. That being so, even if everybody would shout that the force behind these belief systems is him, it would simply fail because Jesus Christ is a fictitious entity who was just created by the bible.
Who is Jesus Christ by the way?
All those defending the name Jesus justify the name to have originated from Yeshua, which is an Aramaic name. However, assuming that said name is in Hebrew, which others claim to be, the theory of those defending the name to have originated from Aramaic or Hebrew does not deserve any merit because in so far as name is concerned, what applies is transliteration and not translation, when converting it from one language to another.
Transliteration is defined as follows:
“Systematic transliteration is a mapping from one system of writing into another, typically grapheme to grapheme. Most transliteration systems are one-to-one, so a reader who knows the system can (more…)
In the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed is the king. It is true also to various kingdoms of Christianity. They are blind because they can not see that only one sect of the many sects may be a true believer of God and the rest are lying, as there is no logical reason to have various sects if they are believing only on the same God. In short, Christianity or Christendom, if taken as a whole, is a confused belief system.
Also, they are blind because they can not see that their belief in Jesus Christ is merely delusional as there was no Jesus name that ever existed when the messiah was here on earth. And speaking of delusion, this is found in 2 Thessalonians 2:11 in relation to the previous verse, which states:
10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.
11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: (KJV)
How severe is the ‘Jesus Christ’ delusion in Catholics and Christians? Is it more severe among Catholics? Or, is it more severe among born-again Christians, Methodists, Baptists, Protestants or members of other Christian sects ? Or, could it be that, in fact, there is no material difference in terms of severity in them?
Of course, the answer is expected to vary from one person to another. It is because, if you are a Catholic, born-again Christian, Methodist, protestant or member of other Christian sect, you will all definitely deny having ‘Jesus Christ’ delusion. In fact, all of you will definitely assert your respective truth, to the point of physically defending your alleged faith. However, because your doctrines and practices are too wide apart, it may only mean that only one of you is telling the truth and the rest are lying, (more…)
Firmly and faithfully believing in the name Jesus as ‘The Christ’ is a sure way to hell. This proposition is based on the fact that the Greek name Ἰησοῦς (Iēsous), which is pronounced as ‘Yah-Zeus’ and origin of English name Jesus, was merely created by ancient Greek writers in 321 AD, when Emperor Constantine of the Roman Empire decreed the formation of Christianity.
Notably, under Emperor Constantine, Christianity was formed based on the combination of Hebrew and pagans’ belief that also combined the name of their respective God-YHWH and Zeus, which was adopted as the name of the messiah.
In their report, the The Nazarean Way Internet Ministry and The Essene-Nazarean Church of Mount Carmel in Missouri found out that the intention of adopting the Greek name Iēsous, as the name of Christ, was to peacefully unite the YHWH and Zeus believers. This is quoted as follows:
In other words, no matter the language spoken – Hebrew, Aramaic, Latin, Greek, et. al. – “He is always called by the name ‘Iēsous,’” pronounced YaH-Zeus; He was never called the common Jewish names “Joshua,” “Yeshua,” or “Yehoshua.” His name is “Iēsous” and it identifies the members of just one Royal Family prominent in Jewish history.