Home » Posts tagged 'Roman Catholic'
Tag Archives: Roman Catholic
Are Catholics and Christians really acknowledging the true messiah before others? The issue, which can be answered by a big NO, is very important because they are publicly professing that they are believers of Christ. More specifically, this is related to Matthew 10:32, which states: “Whoever acknowledges me before others, I will also acknowledge before my Father in heaven.” (Matthew 10:32, NIV).
It is a big NO because if the name Jesus Christ and his alleged image and all doctrines and practices being attached to him are products of evil deceptions, the said believers are, in effect, not acknowledging the true messiah before others.
Others may capitalize on the words found in the bible as sources of alleged truth. But, would they be enough when you attach or connect them to the identity of Jesus Christ, whose name did not ever exist when the messiah was here on earth? Of course, also, the answer is a big NO. That being so, the Jesus Christ entity is actually a traditional lie. And consequently, therefore, believers are dangerously gearing towards destruction or perdition and not salvation, because they will not be acknowledged by the son before the heavenly Father. (more…)
Roman Catholic alleged church leaders must stop condemning or excommunicating anyone, either because of ‘money’ or greed, ‘trickle-down theories’, contraception, abortion, same-sex marriage, pedophilia, reproductive health law, violence in Muslims, murders by mafia or anything which is morally and spiritually bad in heaven, on earth or underneath the sea.
It’s because it’s highly immoral for Roman Catholic Church to condemn or excommunicate, it being entitled to be condemned or excommunicated in the first place. (more…)
Readers, are you aware that the Lord’s prayer in Roman Catholic’s alleged ‘holy’ mass is reversed? And in such a case, are the Roman Catholics using it to insult God instead of respecting Him every Sunday or every time they attend the mass?
Here’s the clue by logic and it’s up for the readers to deliberate on this issue. This is merely to inform. Yours is the decision.
This proposition is related to the use of word ‘amen’ in the Lord’s prayer. Because, amen is necessary to signify the end of the message as well as sincerity of the one praying as regards his message to God.
When prayer ends with amen, the person praying is affirming or confirming his words. It emphasizes the sincerity of the words communicated as well as respect to the Almighty. When it does not end with amen, then it lacks affirmation of the words in prayer, thus, logically, sincerity is in question.
But when the Lord’s prayer starts with amen without ending in it, then there is no other plausible implication but only to insult God because of lack of sincerity as well as setting aside everything in the Lord’s Prayer by technically ending it by saying ‘amen’ first before starting the prayer.
Also, when the Lord’s prayer starts with amen for three times (3x) without ending in it, then the one praying is apparently not satisfied of insulting God once but maybe satisfied of insulting Him thrice. (more…)
This is an academic and theological challenge to Roman Catholic theologians and others. The proposition is: “The cross is a supreme image in Roman Catholicism more superior than rosary, which is just an adjutant of the former”.
In fact, without the cross, rosary, despite being erroneously alleged as ‘most holy’, can not stand on its own and becomes practically and theologically useless, even with all the hearsay allegations to the contrary.
In other words, the alleged ‘crown of roses’ or rosary is highly dependent on the cross. This is how powerful the cross is, without which Roman Catholicism is powerless.
The cross, as a show of its power, is even insulting the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit through Roman Catholicism by indoctrinating Roman Catholics to use their names in vain when praying. This is through making the ”sign of the cross’ before and after praying and indoctrinating followers to say at the same time: “In the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit…Amen”.
Notably, the sign of the cross is in blatant violation of the second commandment ‘not to make images of anything in heaven or on earth or in the water under the earth” (Exodus 20:4)
Also, the alleged sacred ceremonies of Roman Catholicism such as ‘holy?’ mass, ‘holy?’ matrimony and all other religious activities, such as baptism, confirmation, burial , ‘holy?’ week, etc, can not stand on their own without the cross.
If you are a devoted Roman Catholic, you are more likely to recite the ‘Holy Mary, Mother of God’ phrase in rosary. But what are you really doing if God is not the Son of Mother Mary? Are you not simply lying?
Consequently, therefore, the more that you become devoted in praying the rosary, the more that you are doing a regrettable thing, which is lying. And who taught you how to lie?
Also, before you utter the words “holy Mary, mother of god’, have you personally asked Mother Mary to know whether in fact she is the Mother of God?
Or have you asked the Father in heaven whether or not He has a mother?
Or have you asked Christ that his mother is likewise the Mother of the Father in heaven? Or have you asked the priests and nuns of all those questions?
Are you not interested in knowing the answers? If you were not able to ask and know the answers from them, are you then reciting the phrases based (more…)
Mr. President, investigate yourself first before investigating the Local Chief Executives (LCEs). Because, if the LCEs underestimated typhoon Yolanda-it was in the same manner that the administration underestimated the anger of the One who created the typhoon.
While they were inadvertent in their respective duties, you yourself, including your administration, had politically and intentionally also instigated the “anger”.
This is in response to the political move of President Benigno Aquino to investigate LCEs due to heavy damage and death brought by Typhoon Yolanda, intently and politically, laying blame on the alleged but equally inadvertent local government units in destroyed provinces and municipalities.
In so far as this specific issue is concerned, if the President does not like incompetents in the government, then, he should be the first one to go. Because the calamities being suffered by Filipinos are not ordinary scenarios.